Functional evaluation of tractors of traction class 4.0
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2025-1-53-58
Abstract
The optimal choice of purchased equipment based on its functional characteristics is an important task for modern agricultural enterprises. In order to select the optimal tractor model, the cost and types of work performed were compared with three tractors of traction class 4.0: Kirovets K-5, BTZ 254-K, and DEUTZ-FAHR6230 TTV. To determine the differences through the examination, the authors used a methodology of comparing tractor models, taking into account indicators of technological versatility, agrotechnical properties, potential (expected) productivity and cost of performing technological operations. They also determined an indicator of the technological level of tractors. The assessment results showed the applicability of all models for plowing and harvesting operations, as well as for working with mounted combined machines. However, the models were considered unsuitable for inter-row cultivation. As compared with domestic counterparts, the DEUTZ-FAHR6230 TTV can reach higher speeds and higher performance. However, the technological level of Kirovets K-5 and BTZ 254-K tractors has the same value of 0.72 and surpasses the imported analog DEUTZ-FAHR6230 TTV, which has an indicator of 0.69. Taking into account the functional characteristics and cost of tractors, it is profitable for enterprises to purchase domestic equipment.
About the Authors
I. V. GribovRussian Federation
Ivan V. Gribov, CSc (Eng), Department Manager
Moscow, 125438
A. S. Zenin
Russian Federation
Artem S. Zenin, Lead Expert
A. V. Kolomeychenko
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Kolomeychenko, DSc (Eng), Professor, Department Manager
M. V. Shipov
Russian Federation
Maksim V. Shipov, Head of Directorate
S. B. Karyakin
Russian Federation
Sergey B. Karyakin, CSc (Eng), Department Manager
N. V. Perevozchikova
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Perevozchikova, CSc (Eng), Associate Professor
References
1. Medževeprytė U.K., Makaras R., Lukoševičius V., Keršys A. Evaluation of the Working Parameters of a Series-Hybrid Tractor under the Soil Work Conditions. Tehnički vjesnik. 2022;29(1):45-50. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20200506072510
2. Vigoroso L., Caffaro F., Cremasco M.M., Cavallo E. Improv ing tractor safety: A comparison between the usability of a conven tional and enhanced rear-mounted foldable ROPS (FROPS). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(16):10195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610195
3. Solovyev R., Kolomeichenko A., Cheranev S., Gerasimov M., Gribov I. Modular design of diesel-electric tracked tractor with high degree of automation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;2061:012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2061/1/012051
4. Solovyev R., Cheranev S., Karyakin S., Kolomeichen ko A., Gribov I., Evgrafov V., Mezentsev N. The need for creation of high-tech tractors of 0.6-2 traction classes with high degree of automation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;819:012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/819/1/012026
5. Perevozchikova N.V., Rodchenkov D.A., Gribov I.V. Assessment of consumer properties of John Deere tractors. Vestnik of Moscow Goryachkin State Agroengineering University. 2016;1:40-44. (In Russ.)
6. Gribov I.V., Perevozchikova N.V. Assessment of consumer properties of Belarus tractors. In: Contribution of Young Scientists to Agrarian Science: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kinel: SGSKhA (Samara State Agricultural Academy), 2016. P. 622. (In Russ.)
7. Gribov I.V., Perevozchikova N.V. The use of expert judgment in the determination of the technological properties of tractors CLAAS. Vestnik of Moscow Goryachkin State Agroengineering University. 2017;1:30-34. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gribov I.V., Zenin A.S., Kolomeychenko A.V., Shipov M.V., Karyakin S.B., Perevozchikova N.V. Functional evaluation of tractors of traction class 4.0. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2025;27(1):53-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2025-1-53-58