Technology of producing bionutrients based on activated coprolites and evaluation of their effectiveness
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-6-31-38
Abstract
The production of bionutrients in the conditions of industrial production and agricultural enterprises requires the development of technology and a production line for the production of bionutrients of stable quality without the use of chemical reagents. To this end, the authors have developed a technology and a technological line for the production of bionutrients based on the processing of animal waste into coprolites and the use of cavitation to increase their biological efficiency. The article presents the methodology and technological scheme of the production of bionutrients. The technology and the obtained bionutrient ABT-Plant were tested in the Belgorod region on sugar beet LMS-94. In the control sample, the seeds were moistened with water. In four variants, ABT-Plant bionutrient was treated: in the fi rst – seeds; in the second – spraying of vegetative sugar beet plants in the phase of 6-8 real leaves (20 g·t-1); in the third – spraying of vegetative plants (15 g·ha-1) before closing the leaves in the row spacing of sugar beet; in the fourth – seed treatment (20 g·t-1) and spraying of vegetative plants (15 g·ha-1) before closing the leaves in the row spacing of sugar beet. The positive effect of the bionutrient ABT-Plant on the productivity of sugar beet has been established. The best results were achieved when the ABT-Plant preparation was used twice during seed treatment (20 g·t-1) and the vegetation period of plants in the phase of closing beet leaves in row spacing (15 g·ha-1) provided an increase in the yield of sugar beet of 3.5 t·ha-1. The sugar content of sugar beet increased by 5.5-6% compared to the control, the sugar harvest by 0.85 t/ha or by 11.2%.
About the Authors
Yu. A. Shirokov
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Shirokov, DSc (Eng), Professor
49, Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow, 127434
V. N. Platonov
LLC NPC “New Technologies”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Platonov, General Director
115054, PAGE3, 20, 5th Monetchikovsky Lane, Moscow
References
1. Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Schiavon M., Ertani A. Plant biostimulants: Physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Scientia Agricola. 2016;73(1):18-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006
2. Nardi S., Muscolo A., Vaccaro S., Baiano S., Spaccini R., Piccolo A. Relationship between molecular characteristics of soil humic fractions and glycolytic pathway and Krebs cycle in maize seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2007;39(12):3138-3146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.006
3. Mao J., Chen N., Cao X. Characterization of humic substances by advanced solid state NMR spectroscopy: Demonstration of a systematic approach. Organic Geochemistry. 2011;42(8):891-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.03.023
4. Shirokov Yu.A. Dechemicalization of crop production due to organosilicon compounds. Agrarnaya Rossia. 2008;2:33-36. (In Rus.)
5. Canellas L.P., Olivares F.L. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2014;1:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3
6. Katsumi N., Yonebayashi K., Okazaki M., Nishiyama Sh., Nishi T., Hosaka A., Watanabe Ch. Characterization of soil organic matter with different degrees of humification using evolved gas analysis-mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2016;155:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.007
7. Kutovaya O.V. Characteristics of humus and coprolites of eathworms in soddy podzolic farm soils. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2012;69:46-59 (In Rus.)
8. Prusak A.V., Smagin A.V., Kostina N.V., Umarov M.M., Bogdanova T.V. Hydrophysical properties and biological activity of earthworm coprolites of different ecological and trophic groups. Fundamentalnye Issledovaniya. 2008;2:50-51. (In Rus.)
9. Demin V.V., Tikhonov V.V., Vyzov B.A. Modification by earthworms of the structure and biological activity of humic acids. Trudy V Vserossiyskoy konferentsii “Guminovye Veshchestva v Biosphere”. Part 1. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University. 2010:19-25. (In Rus.)
10. Datta S., Singh J., Singh S., Singh S.J. Earthworms, pesticides and sustainable agriculture: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016;23:8227-8243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6375-0
11. Shirokov Y., Tikhnenko V., Ivakina E., Imamzade A. Results of the Study of the Effectiveness of Humic Fertilizers Activated by Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Effects. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. this link is disabled. 2023. 575 LNNS. Рp. 1601-1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21219-2_178
12. Shirokov Yu.A., Tikhonenko V.G., Ivakina E.G., Imamzade A.I. Technology of activation of humic fertilizers by hydrodynamic and acoustic effects and evaluation of their effectiveness. In: Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa. Yubileyniy sbornik nauchnykh trudov XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii. Rostov-on-Don. 2022:205-210. (In Rus.)
13. Fujisawa N., Fujita Y., Yanagisawa K., Fujisawa K., Yamagata T. Simultaneous observation of cavitation collapse and shock wave formation in cavitating jet. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2018;94:159-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.02.012
14. Stanley C., Barber T., Rosengarten G. Re-entrant jet mechanism for periodic cavitation shedding in a cylindrical orifice. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2014;50:169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.07.004
15. Watanabe R., Yanagisawa K., Yamagata T., Fujisawa N. Simultaneous shadowgraph imaging and acceleration pulse measurement of cavitating jet. Wear. 2016;358-359:72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.03.036
Review
For citations:
Shirokov Yu.A., Platonov V.N. Technology of producing bionutrients based on activated coprolites and evaluation of their effectiveness. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2023;25(6):31-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-6-31-38
Views:
146
Email this article 