Development of a parametric model for determining the gas composition of the air environment (ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide) of livestock premises
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-3-13-22
Abstract
Indoor climate parameters influence the productivity of animals and their physiological condition. Exceeding permissible concentrations of gases leads to animal diseases, loss of productivity, and the mortality of young cattle. Therefore, it is reasonable to predict the concentration of gas composition in the livestock houses. To determine and distribute harmful gases (ammonia, hydrogen sulphide, and carbon dioxide) in the livestock house, the authors performed the 3D modeling of a fragment of the farm in the SolidWorks 2020 software package. Parametric models of gas movement under different conditions were created and optimal measurement points of gas concentration in the livestock house were determined. The simulations made it possible to determine the direction of air flows and detect accumulations and clouds of gases. The maximum concentration of carbon dioxide was detected at 0.9m (an air speed of 0 m/sec) and at 1.3m (a speed of 0.75 m/sec). The highest concentration of hydrogen sulphide was found in the area bordering the ridge space (an air speed of 0 m/s) and at the level of 2.25 m (a speed of 2 m/s). The highest concentration of ammonia was observed under the roof and in the area under the ridge (an air speed of 2 m/s). It is recommended to install hydrogen sulphide and ammonia sensors under the ridge, while carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and ammonia sensors – in the stall, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide sensors – near the feed table. Concentrations should be measured at heights of 500, 1500, and 3000 mm. When the concentration of emitted gas increases and other conditions are equal, the concentration of gas in the cloud increases, but the structure of the cloud changes insignificantly. Parameter interrogation sensors should be installed in enclosed ventilated boxes in the same manner as in weather stations.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. V. KirsanovRussian Federation
Vladimir V. Kirsanov, Corresponding Member of RAS, DSc (Eng), Professor
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str., Moscow,109428
I. M. Dovlatov
Russian Federation
Igor M. Dovlatov, CSc (Eng), Research Engineer
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str., Moscow,109428
S. S. Yurochka
Russian Federation
Sergey S. Yurochka, Junior Research Engineer
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str., Moscow,109428
I. V. Komkov
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Komkov, Expert
5, 1stInstitutskiy Proezd Str., Moscow,109428
References
1. Dovlatov I.M., Yuferev L.Yu. Increase in live weight of bred poultry during air purification with a combined recirculator. Electrical engineering and electrical equipment in agriculture. 2020;67:3:124-131.(In Rus.)
2. Kostarev S., Kochetova O., IvanovaA., Sereda T. Project development of a ‘’smart’’ premise system for pig keeping. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021;254:08029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125408029
3. Dovlatov I.M., Rudzik E.S. Improvement of microclimate in agricultural premises due to disinfection of air with ultraviolet radiation. Innovations in agriculture. 2018;3:47-52. (In Rus.)
4. Leliveld L.M.C., Riva E., Mattachini G., Lovarelli D., Provolo G. Dairy Cow Behavior Is Affected by Period, Time of Day and Housing. Animals. 2022;12(4):512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040512
5. Dovlatov I.M., Yurochka S.S. Development of an energy-efficient microclimate system for dairy herd loose keeping. Agricultural machines and technologies. 2021;15(3):73-80. (In Rus.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2021-15-3-73-80
6. Ivanov Yu.G., Kirsanov V.V., Yurochka S.S. Studies of indoor climate parameters in the animal research station of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. Doklady TSKHA. 2019;291(V):115-118. (In Rus.)
7. Assatbayeva G., Issabekova S., Uskenov R., Karymsakov T., Abdrakhmanov T. Influence of microclimate on ketosis, mastitis and diseases of cow reproductive organs. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology. 2022;10(3):2230. http://dx.doi.org/10.31893/jabb.22030
8. Lovarelli D., Riva E., Mattachini G., Guarino M., Provolo G. Assessing the effect of barns structures and environmental conditions in dairy cattle farms monitored in Northern Italy. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2021;52(4):12-29.
9. Martynova E.N., Yastrebova E.A. Features climate barns with natural ventilation system. Veterinary, animal science and biotechnology. 2015;6:52-56. (In Rus.)
10. Kochetova O.V., Kostarev S.N., Tatarnikova N.A., Sereda T.G. Development of microclimate control system in cattle barns for cattle housing in the Perm region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;839:032030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/3/032030
11. Martynova E.N., Yastrebova E.A. Physiological state of cows depending on house microclimate. Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. 2013;8:53-56. (In Rus.)
12. NalivaykoA.P. The system of climate control on farms and cattle complexes. Youth scientific and educational potential in solving actual problems of the XXI century. 2017;6:177-180. (In Rus.)
13. Dovlatov I., Yuferev L., Pavkin D. Efficiency Optimization of Indoor Air Disinfection by Radiation Exposure for Poultry Breeding. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2020;1072:177-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33585-4_18
Review
For citations:
Kirsanov V.V., Dovlatov I.M., Yurochka S.S., Komkov I.V. Development of a parametric model for determining the gas composition of the air environment (ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide) of livestock premises. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2023;25(3):13-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-3-13-22