Study of the strength of 3D-printed products with varying technological parameters in the printing process
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-2-46-51
Abstract
The technology of additive manufacturing of parts makes it possible to signifi cantly reduce the cost of machinery repair. However, the property formation laws of such parts have not been suffi ciently studied. The authors have studied the relationship between the ultimate strength of 3D-printed samples and the number of wall layers and infi ll density. Samples produced according to GOST 11262-2017 by 3D printing using FDM technology from ABS plastic were tested for static stretching. Two groups of samples, diff erent in technological parameters of 3D-printing, were made. In the fi rst group the wall of the samples was formed in four layers, the density of the sample fi ll varied in the range of 20 to 100%. In the second group, the number of wall layers varied from 2 to 10, the infi ll density of the samples corresponded to 33%. When samples were made, extruder temperature was 230°C, table temperature – 110°C, layer height – 0.15 mm, and printing speed – 60 mm/s. An analysis of the yield strength of the samples showed an increase in strength with an increase in the number of wall layers. Signifi cant diff erence of strength values was observed in samples with six layers and more. Signifi cant variation of yield strength values can be explained by the presence of defects in the samples after printing. When infi ll density exceeded 40%, a signifi cant increase in strength was observed due to the densifi cation of polymer molecule bonds. In the range of 20 to 40%, the strength index did not change, because the same structural changes occurred in this range. It was found that the number of wall layers should not exceed the number of inner perimeter layers and the infi ll density of the parts should be 100% to produce polymeric parts of agricultural machinery by 3D printing using FDM technology with maximum strength characteristics.
About the Authors
M. V. TurchenkoRussian Federation
Maksim V. Turchenko, Student
2nd Baumanskaya Str., 5, Moscow, 105005
Y. A. Goncharova
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Goncharova, Research Engineer
1st Institutsky Proezd, Building 5, Moscow, 109428
R. M. Kasimov
Russian Federation
Ruslan M. Kasimov, Engineer
1st Institutsky Proezd, Building 5, Moscow, 109428
References
1. Dorokhov A.S. Sibirev A.V., Aksenov A.G., Sazonov N.V. Laboratory studies of impact impacts of a roller sorting machine on potato tubers. Agrarian science of the Euro-North-East. 2021;22(1):119-127. (In Rus.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.1.119-127
2. Dorokhov A.S., Sviridov A.S., Goncharova Yu.A., Alekhi - na R.A. Assessment of the chemical resistance of polyurethane compounds used in the manufacture of diaphragm piston pumps. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area. 2021;8(290):41-44. (In Rus.)
3. Dorokhov A.S., Zernov V.N., Petukhov S.N. Design requirements for an automated planting unit for potato minitubers. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2021;15(1):9-15. (In Rus.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2021-15-4-9-15
4. Kazberov R.Ya. Application of polymeric materials and additive technologies in electrical equipment of the agro-industrial sector. Elektrotekhnologii i elektrooborudovanie v APK. 2021;4(45):51-55. (In Rus.)
5. Lopatina Yu.A., Denisov V.A. Study of the porosity of composite structures based on 3D-printed frames impregnated with epoxy resin. Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin. 2021;1(142):131-139. (In Rus.)
6. Slavkina V.E., Mirzaev M.A., Lopatina Yu.A. Application of 3D printing technology to optimize gear repair. Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin. 2020;1(138):58-64. (In Rus.)
7. Sviridov A.S., Lopatina Yu.A., Plokhikh A.I. The choice of materials and justifi cation of technological parameters for the manufacture of sliding supports for the repair of garden equipment using additive technologies. Sel'skokhozyaystvennaya tekhnika: obsluzhivanie i remont. 2019;11:54-62. (In Rus.)
8. Lopatina Yu.A. Application of 3D printing by the FDM method in the repair of machinery and equipment. Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin. 2019;3:40-45. (In Rus.)
9. Sviridov A.S., Tuzhilin S.P., Lopatina Yu.A. The concept of a digital 3D farm for use in the repair production of agricultural machinery. Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin. 2019;2:26-32. (In Rus.)
10. Kiseleva A.E. Application of additive technologies in solving design problems in shipbuilding. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2017;48-49:84-88. (In Rus.)
11. Smirnov M.A., Rybkin N.O., Ksenofontova O.L. FDM-technology: application features, advantages, disadvantages. Problemy ekonomiki, fi nansov i upravleniya proizvodstvom: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov vuzov Rossii. 2021;48:115-122. (In Rus.)
12. Kholodilov A.A., Puzynina M.V. Problems arising during three-dimensional printing of objects using FDM technology. Nauka, obrazovanie, innovatsii: aprobatsiya rezultatov issledovaniy. 2017;1:199-204. (In Rus.)
13. Dubinkin D.M., Krasavin A.D., Sorokin V.Yu. Current state of FDM technologies. Sbornik materialov III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Innovatsii v informatsionnykh tekhnologiyakh, mashinostroenii i avtotransporte”. 2019:171-173. (In Rus.)
14. Besedina K.S., Lavrov N.A., Panfi lov D.M., Barskov V.V. Properties of products made of ABS plastics and polyamide obtained by 3D printing. Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State Institute of Technology (Technical University). 2018;45(71):60-63. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Turchenko M.V., Goncharova Y.A., Kasimov R.M. Study of the strength of 3D-printed products with varying technological parameters in the printing process. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2023;25(2):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-2-46-51