Justifi cation of the parameters of an electromechanical transmission for a tractor of traction class of 0.6-0.9 traction class and coordination of traction characteristics
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-1-63-70
Abstract
The parameters of electromechanical transmission for the tractor of 0.6-0.9 traction class are selected based on the analysis of traction and hitching characteristics of the complete machine. The authors have made theoretical calculations of the operating characteristics of the prototype tractor with an internal combustion engine and the tractor layout with an electric drive, traction calculation of the prototype tractor and the tractor layout, and calculation of the characteristics of the electric drive and electric motors. For the calculations, a six-speed manual variable gearbox was selected. The initial data for performing the calculations were obtained from the results of tractor traction tests in the North Caucasian machine test station. Two profile backgrounds of the support base were selected: a fi eld prepared for sowing (fallow) and stubble. As a result of research, it was established that a tractor-model designed on the basis of the self-propelled chassis of a pulling class 0.6 to. 0.9 with capacity up to 50 kW on the “Field prepared for sowing” background reaches the greatest towing effi ciency (0.53) with the 15 kW electric motor and the greatest drawbar pull (5.78 kN) with the 18 kW electric motor. On the “Stubble” background, for 15, 18 and 22kW electric motors, the pulling effi ciency is 68%, but the tractor layout with the 22kW electric motor can develop the maximum drawbar pull of 11.35kN. The maximum pulling power of 16.7 kN is observed in the prototype tractor with an internal combustion engine. Therefore, the 15-kW electric motor can be the only most suitable substitute for a combustion engine by traction efficiency.
About the Authors
Z. A. GodzhaevRussian Federation
Zakhid A. Godzhaev, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, DSc (Eng)
109428
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str.
Moscow
S. E. Senkevich
Russian Federation
Sergey E. Senkevich, PhD (Eng), Associate Professor
109428
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str.
Moscow
I. S. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Ilya S. Alekseev, engineer
109428
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str.
Moscow
E. N. Ilchenko
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Ilchenko, engineer
109428
5, 1st Institutskiy Proezd Str.
Moscow
References
1. Shchigolev S. V., Lomakin S. G. Effect of tire deformation on the transverse static stability of grain combine-harvesters. Vestnik of Moscow Goryachkin Agroengineering University. 2017; 5 (81): 22-28. (In Rus.) doi: 10.26897/1728-7936-2017-5-22-28
2. Baek S.-Y., Kim Y.-S., Kim W.-S., Baek S.-M., Kim Y.-J. Development and verifi cation of a sim ulation model for 120 kW class electric AWD (All-Wheel-Drive) tractor during driving operation. Energies. 2020; 13 (10): 2422. doi: 10.3390/en13102422
3. Li T., Xie B., Li Z., Li J. Design and optimization of a dual-input coupling powertrain system: A case study for electric tractors. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10 (5): 1608. doi: 10.3390/app10051608
4. Melo R., Antunes F., Daher S., Vogt H., Albiero D., Tofoli F. L. Сonception of an electric propulsion system for a 9 kW electric tractor suitable to family farming. IET Electric Power Applications. 2019; 13 (12): 1993-2004. doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0353
5. Chen Y., Xie B., Du Y., Mao E. Powertrain parameter matching and optimal design of dual-motor driven electric tractor. Int J Agric & Biol Eng. 2019; 12 (1): 33-41. doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.3720
6. Osinenko P. V., Geissler M., Herlitzius T. A method of optimal traction control for farm tractors with feedback of drive torque. Biosystems Engineering. 2015; 29: 20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.09.009
7. Buraev M. K., Ovchinnikova N. I., Anosova A. I., Shisteev A. V. Improving the performance of tractors in agriculture. Bulletin of ESSTUM. 2015; 6 (57): 20-25. (In Rus.)
8. Saveliev I. A. Modernization of the mover of the T-25A tractor. Epokha nauki. 2015; 4: 45. (In Rus.)
9. Sorokin M. S., Lisichenko M. L., Yasak V. V. Concepе of development of agricultural machinery with the use of hybrid-drive. Engineering of Nature Management. 2016; (6): 25-28. (In Rus.)
10. Vorotnikov I. L., Muravieva I. V., Petrov K. A. Import substitution in agricultural machinery in russia: state and problems. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. 2018; 8 (86): 52-57. (In Rus.)
11. Tumanova M. I., Tumanov A. M., Mohammed A. Yu. Kh. Analysis of Russian-made mini-tractors used on on small farms. Alleya nauki. 2018; 8 (24): 593-596. (In Rus.)
12. Bogachenko D. D., Bychkova E. V., Kudryavtsev A. V., Ladygin A. N., Sarach B. M., Kholin V. V. Further progress in the field of energy-saving frequency-controlled electric drive. Nauchnoy i uchebno-metodicheskoy shkole elektroprivoda MEI 80 let: Doklady nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara, February 2, 2010. Moscow, Izdatelstvo MEI, 2010. P. 12-21. (In Rus.)
13. Ilyinskiy N. F. Valve-inductor electric drive – problems and development prospects. Ventilno-induktorniy elektroprivod: Doklady nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, February 1, 2007. Moscow, Izdatelstvo MEI, 2007. Рр. 4-13. (In Rus.)
14. Savchenko A. V., Akulenko A. E. Methodology for determining the effi ciency and the energy efficiency of the automated electric drive and automation systems process control. Science Almanac. 2015; 11-3: 368-375. (In Rus.) doi: 10.17117/na.2015.11.03.368
Review
For citations:
Godzhaev Z.A., Senkevich S.E., Alekseev I.S., Ilchenko E.N. Justifi cation of the parameters of an electromechanical transmission for a tractor of traction class of 0.6-0.9 traction class and coordination of traction characteristics. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2023;25(1):63-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2023-1-63-70