AGROTECHNICAL AND ENERGY ASSESSMENT OF RIDGERS AND SEEDBED FORMERS
https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2020-5-4-9
Abstract
The authors propose a method for the assessment the energy efficiency of soil cultivation machines for forming seedbeds and ridges when growing potatoes, Jerusalem artichoke and other vegetables, taking into account the relationship between agrotechnical and energy indicators. The paper describes the results of comparative field tests of tillage machines with different working tools for the same type of technological processes. It is advisable to use the indicator of the unit power consumption, referred to the average diameter of soil clods. The indicator of specific power per average clod diameter for the FGF-1 rotary tiller amounted to 4.0...4.3 kW/mm, for the GPK-2 rotary tiller - 3.3...4.3 kW/mm, and for the KG-1 ridge cultivator - 2.6...3.2 kW/mm. The required power for operation of the cultivator with passive working tools at the maximum possible speed is 5...15% lower, however, the GPK-2 and FGF-1 tillers with active working tools demonstrated higher agrotechnical indicators. For cutting ridges on pre-planting treatment of loamy soil of a medium and heavy mechanical composition, it is recommended to use a rotary cultivator FGF-1, for cutting ridges - a rotary tiller GPK-2. On pre-planting ridging and post-planting inter-row cultivation of light loamy soil the KG-1 tiller with passive working tools is a more preferable solution.
About the Authors
ANDREY I. PanovRussian Federation
NIKOLAY V. Aldoshin
Russian Federation
VALERIY I. Plyaka
Russian Federation
MIKHAIL A. Mekhedov
Russian Federation
References
1. IMAC S.r.l. URL: http://www.imac-rondelli.it/eng /ridge-formers.html (дата обращения: 28.08.2020).
2. SIMON. The designer-manufacturer of equipment for preparing soil and harvesting vegetables. URL: https://www.machines-simon.com/en/our-machines/soil-preparation/twin-rotor-bed-former/single-cultirateau/ (дата обращения: 28.08.2020).
3. Зволинский В.Н., Мосяков М.А., Семичев С.В. Опыт и перспективы применения двухбарабанных ротационных почвообрабатывающих орудий // Тракторы и сельхозмашины. 2016. № 2. С. 24-27.
4. Kazuaki Hirasawa, Takashi Kataoka, Takayuki Kubo. Relationship between Required Power and PTO Speed in Rotary Tiller, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2013. Vol. 46. Issue. 4. Page 141-146. URL: https://doi.org/10.3182/20130 327-3-JP-3017.00033.
5. Prathuang Usaborisut, Kittikhun Prasertkan. Specific energy requirements and soil pulverization of a combined tillage implement. Heliyon, 2019. ISSN2405-8440. Vol. 5. Issue. 11. Page e02757. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02757.
6. Hosokawa Hisashi, Adachi Kazuhide, Itoh Kouichi, Matsuzaki Morio. Rotary Tilling and Ridge-Making Methods for Heavy Clay Soil // Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences. 2001. Volume 35. Issue 4. Рр. 255-261. URL: https://www.jircas.go.jp/en/publication/jarq/35/4/255.
7. Панов А.И. Агротехническая и энергетическая оценка ротационных почвообрабатывающих машин для теплиц // Вестник ФГОУ ВПО «МГАУ имени В.П. Горячкина». 2012. № 5 (56). С. 21-23.
8. Алдошин Н.В., Панов А.И., Мехедов М.А. Совершенствование конструкции фрезерной машины для нарезки гряд // Вестник ФГОУ ВПО «МГАУ имени В.П. Горячкина». 2019. № 1 (89). С. 15-19.
Review
For citations:
Panov A.I., Aldoshin N.V., Plyaka V.I., Mekhedov M.A. AGROTECHNICAL AND ENERGY ASSESSMENT OF RIDGERS AND SEEDBED FORMERS. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2020;(5):4-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2020-5-4-9