Preview

Agricultural Engineering (Moscow)

Advanced search

STRENGTH INDICATORS OF PUMPKIN VARIETIES AND HYBRIDS CULTIVATED MECHANICALLY IN THE TEMPERATE ZONE

https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2022-2-28-33

Abstract

In recent years, industrial growing of pumpkin has been practeced in the temperate zone. The proportion of varieties and hybrids suitable for cultivation in temperate climates and mechanized harvesting is insignificant. Correct choice of varieties requires the knowledge of the physical and mechanical properties of pumpkin. To determine the varieties with the highest hardness, suitable for cultivation in temperate climates and mechanized harvesting, the authors studied the size and weight parameters (biometric), determined the bark and pulp hardness with a penetrometer and the density of pumpkin fruits by hydrostatic weighing. The research objects included sixteen both domestic and foreign pumpkin varieties and hybrids cultivated in a mechanized way: hard-barked (Spaghetti, Pivdennaya, Mozoleevskaya); large-fruited (Pastila Champagne, Barn, Marine Di Chioggia, No. 119-C); nutmeg (Butternut, No. 19-Pgv, Muscat of Provence, Beauty, Vitamin, No. 13-M, No. 26-Mch, No. 28-Ig); fig-leaved - No. 4480. The studies were carried out in the conditions of the Moscow region. Cultivation technology, setting up field experiments and statistical processing of the obtained results were carried out according to the standard method of B.V. Dospekhov. The research was carried out from 2016 to 2020. Based on the studies, the authors stated that the hard-barked pumpkin of the Spaghetti variety (1.20 and 0.80 kg/mm2), large-fruited - Pastila champagne (1.02 and 0.79), nutmeg - Muscat of Provence (1.10 and 0.65) and fig-leaved specimen No. 4480 (1.25 and 0.97 kg/mm2) feature the highest strength indicators. The total number of pumpkins is subject to the law of distribution in terms of size and weight, the weight of fruits on yearly average ranges from 1.56 to 3.3 kg. The obtained results provide enough grounds to recommend these varieties for cultivation in a temperate climate and mechanized harvesting.

About the Authors

ANDREY V. Goncharov
Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy; Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University
Russian Federation


ALEKSANDR G. Gasparyan
Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation


ALEKSANDR G. Levshin
Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation


SHAGEN V. Gasparyan
Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation


References

1. Пивоваров В.Ф., Мещерякова Р.А., Сурихина Т.Н., Разин О.А., Тареева А.А. Мировая экономика и овощеводство России в условиях пандемии COVID-19 (Итоги 2020 года и перспективы восстановления) // Овощи России. 2021. № 3. С. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2021-3-5-14

2. Гаспарян И.Н. Основы производства продукции растениеводства: Учебник для вузов / И.Н. Гаспарян, В.Г. Сычев, А.В. Мельников и др. СПб.: Лань, 2021. 496 с.

3. Buzigi E., Pillay K., Siwela M. Potential of pumpkin to combat vitamin A deficiency during complementary feeding in low and middle income countries: variety, provitamin A carotenoid content and retention, and dietary reference intakes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1896472.

4. Buzigi E., Pillay K., Siwela M. Potential of pumpkin to combat vitamin A deficiency during complementary feeding in low and middle income countries: variety, provitamin A carotenoid content and retention, and dietary reference intakes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1896472

5. Cardozo C.J.M., Hernandez D.M., Gutierrez B.L.C., Velasquez H.J.C., Molina D.A.R., Londofo G.C. Physical, physiological, physicochemical and nutritional characterization of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) in postharvest stage cultivated in antioquia-colombia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia Medellin, 2021; 74(3): 9735-9744. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n3.90820

6. Белик В.Ф. Бахчеводство / М.: Колос, 1982. 176 с.

7. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. М.: Колос, 1979. 412 с.

8. Цепляев А.Н., Шапров М.Н., Семин Д.В. и др. Определение некоторых механико-технологических свойств плодов тыквы // Материалы II Российской научно-практической конференции «Физико-технические проблемы создания новых технологий в агропромышленном комплексе». Ставрополь, 2003. С. 549-551.

9. Китов А.Ю. Оптимизация параметров выделителя семян из плодов бахчевых культур // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: Наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2015. № 1. С. 125-128.

10. Цепляев А.Н. Уборка плодов бахчевых культур // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: Наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2011. № 2(22). С. 110.

11. Шапров М.Н. Технология комплексной переработки плодов тыквы // Проблемы АПК: Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции. Волгоград: Изд-во ВГСХА, 2003. С. 93-95.


Review

For citations:


Goncharov A.V., Gasparyan A.G., Levshin A.G., Gasparyan Sh.V. STRENGTH INDICATORS OF PUMPKIN VARIETIES AND HYBRIDS CULTIVATED MECHANICALLY IN THE TEMPERATE ZONE. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow). 2022;24(2):28-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2022-2-28-33

Views: 143


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-1149 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1130 (Online)